data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00be3/00be350f889edabb2037956912eb6e6c19dc41cf" alt=""
Saturday, October 31, 2009
poets in the green room
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f115/2f115f6d74fed2ac0e1d540672e56223f99e3308" alt=""
Labels:
Kelly Writers House,
Robert Grenier,
Ron Silliman
can a poem be political?
Kevin Davies on political poetry:
I'm reminded of Ed Dorn saying something like 'You're handing me this piece of paper and telling me it's political? It's about as political as a gopher hole.' I'm totally agnostic about the ability of unpopular verse to affect change in the political world. I just don't believe it. I don't think for a second, oh, here I am striking a blow against capital. Political change is not made by the choices that we're making in verse. We're doing this so that certain possibilities can exist in the world. So that works of art can exist, temporarily, and they'll certainly bear traces of our political vision because if they don't they're no good.
I'm reminded of Ed Dorn saying something like 'You're handing me this piece of paper and telling me it's political? It's about as political as a gopher hole.' I'm totally agnostic about the ability of unpopular verse to affect change in the political world. I just don't believe it. I don't think for a second, oh, here I am striking a blow against capital. Political change is not made by the choices that we're making in verse. We're doing this so that certain possibilities can exist in the world. So that works of art can exist, temporarily, and they'll certainly bear traces of our political vision because if they don't they're no good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e913b/e913bc43f56339df9f4839faa0e6eba1e75c4e37" alt=""
Labels:
political poetry
Friday, October 30, 2009
Alf teaches poetry virtually
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e2b/13e2ba518bd7b159bd1377e54ec9027fec14e34d" alt=""
Labels:
Kelly Writers House,
poetry,
poetry experiments,
Second Lie
Thursday, October 29, 2009
the whenever-we-feel-like-it aesthetic thrives
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e896/0e89625114985605d682ccb87418ca2e9d0f54b1" alt=""
Labels:
Kelly Writers House,
PENNsound,
poetry
Monday, October 26, 2009
Ashbery actually explicates
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/473ca/473caafbe5d2239e592cec6607595cff3b7585ed" alt=""
Rare it is that John Ashbery explains one of his poems. But, in a radio interview in 1966, he did that just. He read "These Lacustrine Cities" and then went line by line offering various sorts of explanations - paraphrase, sources for phrases and words, a sense of the process of composition. Now we have released a PennSound podcast, #18 in our series, featuring this recording, which aired on WKCR. The podcast is 18 minutes long.
autumnal podcast
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04437/0443700b206a7d428505dc63843ebb8e13697ef0" alt=""
The podcast features Ellen Yin (founder of Fork restaurant), Tom Devaney (from his poem "At Franklin's Grave"), former longtime KWH director Kerry Sherin Wright ("Autumn Lullaby"), Eileen D'Angelo ("Love Letter to a Moody Sea") and Ben Lerner (excerpt from "Doppler Elegies").
Labels:
Kelly Writers House,
podcasts
Waldrops coming
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8f77/c8f7706c14406f3b169c5199a4ef2c7884aa4672" alt=""
Labels:
Baudelaire,
Kelly Writers House,
Waldrops
the sun was not the sun
You should watch all 30 minutes of Edith's testimony as a survivor of Auschwitz. But if you cannot watch the whole thing, at least for now, move the counter to 15:19 and listen/watch as Edith tries to "describe" Auschwitz in sum.
wordsmith Yankee
My friend Irwyn made the following clever observation ("Mo"=Mariano Rivera, of course):
I know this is not your dream Series scenario, but how about a tip of the cap to Mo, the wordsmith, who, when asked by the silly post-game interviewer what was going through his head when he was called in to pitch two innings of relief, said: "Get six outs." Most succinct job summary since Eastwood's Man With No Name going out to face the gunmen with: "Get three coffins ready." Bon Mo, who knew?
Sunday, October 25, 2009
objectivist home
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee185/ee1853e971889d2e272e29d40b69ed15cc5776f1" alt=""
Facebook people can have the treat of seeing Joey Yearous-Algozin's recent photographs of Lorine Niedecker's house: here.
teaching with sound
The very fact that audio recordings of poetry are now readily available to the classroom can be turned to a great advantage and can at least temporarily change the relationship between teacher and student. It is surely the case that when my students and I in class together listen to sound files instead of reading poem-texts, our vocabularies tend to be on the same plane. I might have a subtler response to what we’re hearing, and certainly I know far more than they about the sound in literary-historical context, but they are never struck dumb by the terminology I bring to bear on the point I seek to make about the specific sound of the words, the poetics of it. The students notice this difference – between their talk about the poem on the page and their talk about the sounded or recorded poems – and their discussion of poetics generally becomes charged with it. If it is true of those who perform spoken poetry that (as David Antin has put it) ‘it was my habit to record my talks / to find out what i[’]d said’ then similarly, the disorienting and terminologically disruptive mode I am describing is the means by which we might find out what we are teaching.
See an earlier post: "Classroom as Kiva."
See an earlier post: "Classroom as Kiva."
Dylan's guide to presidents
Poe and madmen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee54e/ee54eb8f826f1975df8c9f6a104565c0e2ff1c3f" alt=""
Poet, critic, teacher, reviewer and former Writers House program coordinator Tom Devaney has a good piece on Poe (in time for Halloween) in today's Philadelphia Inquirer.
Labels:
Tom Devaney
Barbara Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab21e/ab21eca90c9a15963caaeafdac5a50e74b6f5107" alt=""
Labels:
Barbara Guest,
PoemTalk
Saturday, October 24, 2009
transcontinental hypnotics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a835/1a835c07ded2feafa53aea05b32e100b56f86578" alt=""
Jackson and Anne
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc684/bc684330cfc88a0313a8e9c33c205b14ea62fcd4" alt=""
(c) Lawrence Schwartzwald
Labels:
Jackson Mac Low,
New York City life
WCW in SL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7669b/7669b9d1665f1263a21cc74a626374081bfc6ac8" alt=""
Labels:
Second Life,
WCW
no ideas but what's from the hardware store
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6297e/6297e639a8f683a7477df5ede2c4191069738403" alt=""
Friday, October 23, 2009
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
it's a small world after all
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17738/177387ee39a0a33a9a064ba5231ad0911b737146" alt=""
This straight from Disney World. Photo taken this past weekend. Jews are now part of the "It's a Small World" exhibit. Tell your neighbors. Tell your friends.
Photo courtesy Lauren Roberts
Labels:
Disney,
Jewish culture
Sunday, October 18, 2009
rather than have his mind stop
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/523bc/523bcf5db4232b7a7925974b117f340bbc91a8c7" alt=""
Wyndham Lewis chose blindnessphoto credit: (c) Lawrence Schwartzwald
rather than have his mind stop...
Time, space,
neither life nor death is the answer.
Labels:
Ezra Pound,
free verse,
prosody
goodbye, Cathy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dfef/1dfefbd14707aa0b833cf102f83ab130613de5eb" alt=""
In the late 80s we lived next door to Al and Cathy - and then Kelly too. I say "next door," and I really mean it. Or "next window." Our living room windows were three feet from each other, in two row houses on the 23rd block of Spruce Street. In the warm months, when windows were open, we heard everything going on in each other's lives. When infant Kelly was up all night (screaming for an hour at a time), sometimes I would lean out the window and talk with Cathy as she walked the baby around on her shoulder, trying to quiet her. Sometimes I would even hum the baby a lullaby from my neighborly perch. I can't remember what Cathy and I talked about on such occasions, but I'm certain it included hilarious riffs on the ironies of parenting. She was of course deliciously funny, especially at moments otherwise tough to endure.
Friday, October 16, 2009
Celan primer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc098/bc0988b76e1af2d785e98dd47da1a30cc12299b7" alt=""
I've prepared a document that might nicely serve as a primer to Paul Celan's wartime experience and early poems. It includes a page-long summary of his life c. 1941-45 and then five pages from Pierre Joris' excellent introductory profile to his Paul Celan: Selections, followed by the texts of just two early poems. Here is that document (PDF).
young journalists at our house
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fef0/4fef0adbf44cb87c4c1527d6790389dc4d30a5a0" alt=""
Labels:
Kelly Writers House
myth at Yale: undergraduate teaching requirement
Below is the first part of an article appearing in today's "Yale Daily News." For the full article, click here.
One of the Yale Admissions Office’s favorite selling points to prospective students — that, unlike at many other large research universities, all of Yale’s tenured professors in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences teach undergraduate courses — is widely believed by students and faculty.
But it’s not that simple. In fact, there is no policy requiring professors to teach undergraduates, and in any given semester, a handful of them, for a variety of reasons, do not.
According to this year’s Yale College admissions viewbook, “100 percent of tenured professors in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences teach undergraduate courses.” Interviews with professors in several departments reveal that faculty members believe this to be a rule. However, Deputy Provost J. Lloyd Suttle confirmed Thursday that no such policy exists.
Indeed, a search on the Online Course Information Web site reveals at least a dozen Yale faculty members who are not teaching undergraduate courses this year. In many cases, Yale College students still have the opportunity to be taught by these faculty members if they enroll in graduate-level courses, and administrators said that (while they do not have formal records) they have not identified any professors who routinely do not teach undergraduates.
Still, admissions representatives often use the idea that professors must teach undergraduates to emphasize Yale’s focus on undergraduate teaching.
“Most of the tour guides when discussing the introductory biology courses will mention that, even at the introductory level, there are Yale’s most renowned professors in the classroom, for example [Nobel laureate] Sidney Altman in MCDB 200: Molecular Biology,” tour guide Matthew Sheehan ’11 said.
While Dean of Undergraduate Admissions Jeff Brenzel said he understands that scheduling conflicts can preclude professors from teaching undergraduates in a given academic year, he said he still believes Yale expects all tenured faculty to teach undergraduate courses.
“Our viewbook states that 100 percent of tenured faculty in the Arts and Sciences teach undergraduates, and we convey that to [prospective students], because that is Yale’s expectation,” Brenzel wrote in an e-mail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac44c/ac44c2da25ed72f1ead11f7ece328a042cbfa5b7" alt=""
But it’s not that simple. In fact, there is no policy requiring professors to teach undergraduates, and in any given semester, a handful of them, for a variety of reasons, do not.
According to this year’s Yale College admissions viewbook, “100 percent of tenured professors in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences teach undergraduate courses.” Interviews with professors in several departments reveal that faculty members believe this to be a rule. However, Deputy Provost J. Lloyd Suttle confirmed Thursday that no such policy exists.
Indeed, a search on the Online Course Information Web site reveals at least a dozen Yale faculty members who are not teaching undergraduate courses this year. In many cases, Yale College students still have the opportunity to be taught by these faculty members if they enroll in graduate-level courses, and administrators said that (while they do not have formal records) they have not identified any professors who routinely do not teach undergraduates.
Still, admissions representatives often use the idea that professors must teach undergraduates to emphasize Yale’s focus on undergraduate teaching.
“Most of the tour guides when discussing the introductory biology courses will mention that, even at the introductory level, there are Yale’s most renowned professors in the classroom, for example [Nobel laureate] Sidney Altman in MCDB 200: Molecular Biology,” tour guide Matthew Sheehan ’11 said.
While Dean of Undergraduate Admissions Jeff Brenzel said he understands that scheduling conflicts can preclude professors from teaching undergraduates in a given academic year, he said he still believes Yale expects all tenured faculty to teach undergraduate courses.
“Our viewbook states that 100 percent of tenured faculty in the Arts and Sciences teach undergraduates, and we convey that to [prospective students], because that is Yale’s expectation,” Brenzel wrote in an e-mail.
Labels:
higher education,
pedagogy
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
on schoolchildren being taught to praise the President
Dialogue last night and today with my friend Dave (a former student and someone who has often disagreed with my positions, although not--thank goodness--my mode). I was tempted, outside the dialogue, to add a final editorial bloggy word from me, but then decided to leave the discussion as was.
Dave: Loathe though I am to consume your time, and please don't consider this to be a request, I'd be interested in reading your thoughts on this mess on your blog/Facebook/somesuch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t30cyQwaXZg. [A YouTube video of schoolchildren being taught to praise the President.]
Al: Just like what I had to do for JFK in grade school!
Dave: That your *reassuring* citation to precedent is boomer Kennedy devotionals (I'd love to read one) isn't a good sign, especially for Obama (I mean that on a policy level) or the well-being of the country. Anyway, I'm not going to be a time schnurrer. Be well.
Al: My point is perhaps that presidential devotionals, performed by idiotic teachers and civic leaders, are ubiquitous across eras and ideologies. Americans have devotedly prayed for their presidents, and instructed their children to do so, long before YouTube could capture the phenomenon. Doesn't make the purveyors of such crap any less or more idiotic. But doesn't either require us to change or perception of JFK or Reagan or Ike (oh did the heartland love Ike piously) or the current president. And Prezes who came along in times of malaise (Washington, FDR, Reagan, Obama) stir this idiocy more than others, but not, to me, significantly.
Dave: You'd know better than me, which is why I was curious what you thought. I don't find the ubiquity reassuring. There's differences in eras, depth and scope of devotion, and what's driving the devotion (reaction). The new devotees are last year's dissafecteds and the tea partiers and birthers are last years devotees. If you see these things as inversely correlated oscillations, your reassurance that they are constant is undermined to me by the idea that they can get further and further out of whack.
Al: Bottom line for me is that there are some people out of whack on both sides of liking/disliking the president (as for any Prez*). I don't pay much attention to them on either side. (* I've read over the years about the intense hatred of JFK. I'm not a fan of JFK's presidency but I really can't give much credence to those irrational views; my disappointment with him has little or nothing to do what those people were feeling.)
Dave: To steal a play I learned from you, the reassurance by ubiquity sounds...ahistorical ;-) On an abstraction-level, doesn't how far out of whack and where matter? And what they're doing to put it back on track? One of the things that's been interesting to me lately is the conversion of unlike things between different forms--there are people, for instance, who turn degrees of volatility (oscillations in price) into money irrespective of whether the change in value in up or down. And that's things that get incrementally measured--ideas are doing all sorts of unmeasurable, even contradictory, things at once. I've decided I don't like these people--they're very big and uncoupled from things. Their motivations are suspect and their means to implement their motivations, good or bad, aren't reliable or safe to bystanders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47457/4745780a4a9df6cc0630b47728d3030b2836a847" alt=""
Al: Just like what I had to do for JFK in grade school!
Dave: That your *reassuring* citation to precedent is boomer Kennedy devotionals (I'd love to read one) isn't a good sign, especially for Obama (I mean that on a policy level) or the well-being of the country. Anyway, I'm not going to be a time schnurrer. Be well.
Al: My point is perhaps that presidential devotionals, performed by idiotic teachers and civic leaders, are ubiquitous across eras and ideologies. Americans have devotedly prayed for their presidents, and instructed their children to do so, long before YouTube could capture the phenomenon. Doesn't make the purveyors of such crap any less or more idiotic. But doesn't either require us to change or perception of JFK or Reagan or Ike (oh did the heartland love Ike piously) or the current president. And Prezes who came along in times of malaise (Washington, FDR, Reagan, Obama) stir this idiocy more than others, but not, to me, significantly.
Dave: You'd know better than me, which is why I was curious what you thought. I don't find the ubiquity reassuring. There's differences in eras, depth and scope of devotion, and what's driving the devotion (reaction). The new devotees are last year's dissafecteds and the tea partiers and birthers are last years devotees. If you see these things as inversely correlated oscillations, your reassurance that they are constant is undermined to me by the idea that they can get further and further out of whack.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b17db/b17db2d2c638d8bbd2c9e34fc5f450364043b865" alt=""
Dave: To steal a play I learned from you, the reassurance by ubiquity sounds...ahistorical ;-) On an abstraction-level, doesn't how far out of whack and where matter? And what they're doing to put it back on track? One of the things that's been interesting to me lately is the conversion of unlike things between different forms--there are people, for instance, who turn degrees of volatility (oscillations in price) into money irrespective of whether the change in value in up or down. And that's things that get incrementally measured--ideas are doing all sorts of unmeasurable, even contradictory, things at once. I've decided I don't like these people--they're very big and uncoupled from things. Their motivations are suspect and their means to implement their motivations, good or bad, aren't reliable or safe to bystanders.
Labels:
ideology,
Obama,
the presidency,
YouTube
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
the formalist lounge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c351/5c351d81ad483b67459d7030eefbcc25525f201e" alt=""
Monday, October 12, 2009
5-page paper on Stevens, yours for just $59.75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dfea/2dfeaf916784c133dd4370332e1bd7371f4a8c03" alt=""
But the price. Here's the kicker. Today, looking for a quick e-text of Stevens's poem "Mozart, 1935" (readers of this blog will know that I am somewhat obsessed with this poem)--I was too lazy at the moment to walk to the shelf for my copy of the book--I found a 5-page paper "interpreting" this poem. The cost: $59.75. I was so chagrined that I was very tempted to buy a copy and then...what?....expose? rail against? these people. What's more, the little summary reading of the poem remarkably resembles my own reading of it (in a book and at least two articles, the latter available online). Is it possible that I would have been buying a hack-job remix of my own article on the poem? (Click on the image above and left for a larger view.)
I think I would have asked for reimbursement from my university-sponsored research fund for this expense. After all, it would have been research. No?
How desperate would a student have to be to use one of these sites?
As Stevens says, "Play the present."
Labels:
plagiarism,
universities,
Wallace Stevens
Sunday, October 11, 2009
distance learning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1ee1/c1ee1bf725e2a335212508e47cff52692c55c8d7" alt=""
I have not attended the u. of pennsylvania and have not enjoyed the privilege of attending classes with charles bernstein. but you know what? Bernstein has been one of my most valuable and appreciated teachers over the past 5 years or so. How? because of his poetry, his radio programs, his books of essays and criticism, his conference appearances, his blog (which, yes, promotes his own work, but to a much larger degree promotes the work of others), and because of his work with Al Filreis, producing the audio content on Pennsound. I met Charles at a conference last year sponsored by the Academy of American Poets in NY a year ago. The guy’s passion and counter-establishment perspective will always be attractive to me.
Labels:
Charles Bernstein,
digital culture,
higher education
Saturday, October 10, 2009
unfair fair use
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ea66/2ea66efb91303abc9b81d3f4d6aff6e1e8ddd8fb" alt=""
Labels:
cinema studies,
copyright,
film,
intellectual property
intrepid design for new Barnes
Barnes Foundation architects Tod Williams and Billie Tsien talk about their design for the new building for the Barnes on the Parkway. Exciting!
poems for the millenium, take 3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d8c6/1d8c6e25776fae91ff1d31fb872eb578c92568f6" alt=""
Labels:
anthologies,
Jerome Rothenberg,
romanticism
Friday, October 09, 2009
the late Cid
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610cf/610cf7d74cdddd69ab44fdfd1fde6366beef7493" alt=""
Labels:
Cid Corman,
PoemTalk
2 bits of Perloffiana
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/940cd/940cde6e491eff80cd47d75892667b7de8a7aca0" alt=""
Susan Stewart: Marjorie, unlike other American intellectuals, thinks constantly about the future. This is why she is one of my favorite European intellectuals.
Bob Perelman: Didn't someone in some universe once say, "May the Force be with you"? Poets in the innovative universe say it this way when any new project is being launched: "May Marjorie be with you."
(2) And speaking of Marjorie, or speaking of Marjorie speaking: PennSound has just now added a recording of the 1989 "off-site" reading at the Modern Language Association conference that year. Marjorie read from her then-in-progress book, Radical Artifice. It was '89 and she was advocating that we get away from the term "language writing." Have a listen. And check out PennSound's off-site MLA reading page.
Labels:
Kelly Writers House,
Marjorie Perloff,
MLA,
PENNsound
Thursday, October 08, 2009
today on the London tube
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21543/21543dc32de7d9971e598c09814df67a8b7bf9a9" alt=""
Joe Milutis writes: "So is it now 'I have eaten and which forgive me,' and 'I have eaten you were probably so sweet.'? They've unintentionally turned Williams into Queneau thru bad graphic design. (What's the permutation? 9! That's 362,880 plums.)"
Labels:
English 88,
WCW
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
Louis Kahn's grand-daughter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c465/7c4655af85c9ab04ad699f64ff6d1fb119925697" alt=""
Labels:
Kelly Writers House
Sunday, October 04, 2009
so decorative as to be abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9036a/9036a176b0fbc647ea49088f68d66bd9d668caf0" alt=""
Lewis Lapham
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0984/e0984dc87661b859cca951588abf50de495b78dd" alt=""
Labels:
Kelly Writers House
new invisible cities
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/380b2/380b2877519179966644d391778343ce0b187195" alt=""
Labels:
CPCW,
puppet theater,
Tom Devaney
Thursday, October 01, 2009
finish this or die
Labels:
holocaust,
Terrence Des Pres
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)